Our Work

Energy has become one of the most strategically sensitive components of Serbia’s EU accession process, not because of legislative transposition alone, but because electricity markets now function as a real-world test of regulatory discipline, institutional independence and economic resilience. Chapters related to energy, competition, climate policy and state aid converge in the power sector, making...

Energy has become one of the most strategically sensitive components of Serbia’s EU accession process, not because of legislative transposition alone, but because electricity markets now function as a real-world test of regulatory discipline, institutional independence and economic resilience. Chapters related to energy, competition, climate policy and state aid converge in the power sector, making...

Energy has become one of the most strategically sensitive components of Serbia’s EU accession process, not because of legislative transposition alone, but because electricity markets now function as a real-world test of regulatory discipline, institutional independence and economic resilience. Chapters related to energy, competition, climate policy and state aid converge in the power sector, making...

By 2025, Europe’s industrial challenge stopped being framed as a shortage of capital or technology and became unmistakably a shortage of certified, deployable skills. Manufacturing plants, energy assets, grids, and infrastructure systems were increasingly constrained not by equipment availability, but by the lack of operators, technicians, and engineers authorised to run them under tightening regulatory regimes....

By 2025, European capital deployment into industry, energy, and infrastructure had become more selective, not because opportunities disappeared, but because technical risk moved to the centre of valuation. Assets are older, systems are more complex, regulation is denser, and performance assumptions are scrutinised more aggressively by lenders, insurers, and investment committees. In this environment, technical due...

By 2025, European OEMs and industrial asset owners quietly acknowledged a structural imbalance in their operating models. Equipment fleets were growing more complex and more software-dependent, while internal teams responsible for lifecycle support were shrinking. Skilled technicians were harder to hire, travel budgets were under pressure, and sustainability rules discouraged constant on-site intervention. Yet the...

By 2025, European industry had largely solved the problem of data collection. Sensors, SCADA systems, historians, and enterprise platforms generated unprecedented volumes of operational information across factories, grids, fleets, and infrastructure assets. What remained unsolved was the harder problem: turning that data into decisions that materially improve performance under real operating constraints. This gap between data...

By 2025, one of the most persistent failure points in European industrial and energy projects was no longer technology, financing, or permitting. It was the interface between technical reality and contractual allocation of risk. Performance guarantees that do not reflect grid behaviour, liquidated damages that ignore commissioning constraints, availability metrics detached from operating conditions, and EPC...

By 2025, European industry reached an uncomfortable conclusion: traditional quality assurance models no longer scale. Plants are geographically fragmented, supplier bases are deeper and more global, and regulatory scrutiny has intensified. Yet the number of experienced inspectors, quality engineers, and certification specialists inside the EU is shrinking, not expanding. Travel costs, ESG constraints, and workforce...

Back to top