Our Work

By 2025, European capital deployment into industry, energy, and infrastructure had become more selective, not because opportunities disappeared, but because technical risk moved to the centre of valuation. Assets are older, systems are more complex, regulation is denser, and performance assumptions are scrutinised more aggressively by lenders, insurers, and investment committees. In this environment, technical due...

By 2025, European OEMs and industrial asset owners quietly acknowledged a structural imbalance in their operating models. Equipment fleets were growing more complex and more software-dependent, while internal teams responsible for lifecycle support were shrinking. Skilled technicians were harder to hire, travel budgets were under pressure, and sustainability rules discouraged constant on-site intervention. Yet the...

By 2025, European industry had largely solved the problem of data collection. Sensors, SCADA systems, historians, and enterprise platforms generated unprecedented volumes of operational information across factories, grids, fleets, and infrastructure assets. What remained unsolved was the harder problem: turning that data into decisions that materially improve performance under real operating constraints. This gap between data...

By 2025, one of the most persistent failure points in European industrial and energy projects was no longer technology, financing, or permitting. It was the interface between technical reality and contractual allocation of risk. Performance guarantees that do not reflect grid behaviour, liquidated damages that ignore commissioning constraints, availability metrics detached from operating conditions, and EPC...

By 2025, European industry reached an uncomfortable conclusion: traditional quality assurance models no longer scale. Plants are geographically fragmented, supplier bases are deeper and more global, and regulatory scrutiny has intensified. Yet the number of experienced inspectors, quality engineers, and certification specialists inside the EU is shrinking, not expanding. Travel costs, ESG constraints, and workforce...

By 2025, compliance stopped being an overhead and became a traded input into European industry. Carbon accounting, product traceability, lifecycle disclosure, and audit-ready documentation are no longer optional supplements to production; they are prerequisites for market access. The European Union’s regulatory stack—CBAM, the Digital Product Passport, expanded Scope 1–3 reporting, and supplier-level ESG audits—has effectively...

Europe’s energy transition is no longer constrained by ambition or capital. It is constrained by system behaviour. By 2025, the dominant risk across European power systems shifted from capacity adequacy to operational stability. Variable generation, congested networks, electrification of demand, and cross-border flows have created grids that are mathematically complex, operationally fragile, and politically sensitive. This...

Across Europe, industrial capital is no longer constrained by financing or technology. It is constrained by people. By 2025, the most binding bottleneck across manufacturing, energy, utilities, and heavy industry is not steel, power, or software—it is the shortage of engineers capable of supporting live, regulated assets. This shortage is structural, forecast to persist through...

By the second half of the 2020s, Europe’s environmental agenda stopped being framed as aspiration and started functioning as enforceable demand. Waste diversion targets, water-quality thresholds, industrial permitting rules, and supply-chain ESG audits now translate directly into capital expenditure and long-term service contracts. As EU standards propagate outward through trade, procurement, and financing conditions, countries...

Back to top